The inbox that has to be sorted before real work starts. The files that get renamed by hand. The deadline somebody has to remember. We take it off your desk — inside the Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace you already use.
20 minutes, no jargon. Tell us where it hurts and we'll send back a written plan with a price.
Six questions about a normal week. You'll get a real number — hours, and dollars — before you ever talk to us. Takes about two minutes.
No signup. And if the number is too small to be worth fixing, we'll be the ones to tell you.Counted conservatively: the low end of every range, 48 working weeks, and only 60% of the time treated as recoverable. You can check every number.
Every firm we talk to says a version of the same six things.
Tick what sounds like your firm. Twenty minutes. Nothing to prepare.
We start with three. The ones that hurt most.
Mail read, sorted, and routed. Agency notices escalated the moment they land. Nothing sits.
Documents named, matched to the right client, and filed. Every time, the same way.
Reminders that go out on a schedule, not when someone remembers. Escalation before it slips.
Inquiry to onboarded without a single dropped step. Folders, forms, portal, engagement letter.
Invoices on completion. Overdue chased politely and automatically. Stops when they pay.
Onboarding, approvals, renewals, meeting notes that turn into actual tasks.
One daily read. What came in, what got handled, what needs you.
Status they can check without emailing to ask. Chasers that go out before they have to.
Twenty minutes, honestly answered. No technical knowledge required.
So we don't waste your first call on discovery you already did.
We talk through what you ticked and what it's actually costing you.
If it isn't worth the money, we'll be the ones to tell you.
Most of what we build isn't on any feature list. It's the workaround that only exists because of a decision somebody made in 2016.
Sell you something that won't pay for itself. If the hours aren't there we'll say so on the first call — our own calculator is built to talk us out of the sale when the numbers don't work. We'd rather lose a project than start one that can't win.
Fixed scope, flat price, agreed before we build. We start with one workflow as a pilot — you see it working on your own real work before you commit to anything bigger.
Most automation vendors are a support ticket and a time zone away. We're down the road. We'll sit with your team, watch how the work actually moves, and build from what we see — not from what a questionnaire says.
The most valuable automations we've built came from watching someone work for twenty minutes — not from a feature request. People rarely think to mention the thing that annoys them most. They just do it.
We build it, then we keep it running and keep making it better. No per-seat maths.
One workflow that's costing you real hours. Proof before commitment.
then $500/month
The inbox, the filing, and the deadlines — the three that hurt most, together.
then $1,000/month
Your whole back office, rebuilt. For firms who know exactly what they want gone.
scoped from your worksheet
No. And if that's what you're hoping for, we're probably the wrong fit. What we remove is the work your team already resents — the sorting, the renaming, the remembering, the chasing. Nobody went into this profession to retype invoice numbers. What we see is people getting their week back and spending it on the work that actually needs a human.
Most of it never leaves the Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace you already own. We build inside the environment you control.
Being straight with you: some workflows do route through outside services — that's how certain integrations work. When that's the case we name the specific tool, what data touches it, and why, in writing, before we build anything. You approve it or we find another way. You will never discover after the fact that your client data went somewhere you didn't agree to.
It will, sometimes. Anything that reads a document and makes a judgment starts imperfect and improves with feedback.
That's why nothing we build acts without a review queue. When the system isn't confident it stops and asks a person, instead of guessing quietly and hoping nobody notices. You see every one of those, and each correction makes the next one better. The failure mode is "waiting for you", never "silently wrong".
We hear that a lot. Usually it's the same story: it was switched on everywhere at once, something went wrong early, and nobody trusted it again.
We start with one workflow as a pilot. One thing, built properly, running on your real work, where you can see whether it's actually right before anything else gets touched. If the pilot doesn't earn its keep you've found that out cheaply. Nothing scales until the first thing genuinely works.
Days for the straightforward things — work that just needs to happen reliably and on schedule.
Two to three weeks for anything involving judgment: reading documents, matching them to the right client, deciding what's urgent. Those need a tuning period where accuracy climbs. We'd rather it be right than early, and we'll tell you which category your job is in before you sign anything.
Then we don't touch anything. Tell us your blackout period and we build around it — we can do the work during, and deploy after. Nobody sensible deploys into your busiest week, and we've never been in a hurry that justified it.
Almost certainly, yes. Modern tools with clean integrations are easy. But most of the real time sink in a small firm lives in the awkward stuff — the desktop program from 2011, the spreadsheet three people maintain, the documents that arrive four different ways. If a person is doing it by hand there's usually a way. Tell us what you're running and we'll tell you honestly whether it's worth it.
Fixed scope and a flat price, agreed before we build. You'll know the number before you commit.
The worksheet gives you an estimate of what the busywork is costing you now, using deliberately conservative numbers we show you on screen, so you can compare it against what we'd charge. If the comparison doesn't clearly favour doing it, we'll say so.
That's our job. You just need to know where it hurts.